Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 310 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 310 OEM
0.28 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +1178%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
160
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
7.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
Navi 24
Caicos XT (215-0804070)
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy