Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs ATI FirePro V7800

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs ATI FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800 +191%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1440
24
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Cypress
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy