Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 A240 vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon R5 A240 vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A240 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 A240 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 A240 +174%
0.659 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Oct 2010
All-In-One
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
160
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Jet
GPU Name
Seymour
Jet XT
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy