Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 A255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M

AMD Radeon R5 A255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A255 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 A255 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock940MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 A255 +200%
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250M
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2009
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
940 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
GT215
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
N10E-GE-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy