Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 A255 vs AMD Radeon R9 A375

AMD Radeon R5 A255 vs AMD Radeon R9 A375

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A255 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 A375 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 A255 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (940MHz vs 925MHz)
AMD Radeon R9 A375 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 A255
0.721 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 A375 +80%
1.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2015
All-In-One
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
10
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.24 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1299 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Venus
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
Venus XTX (216-0846033)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy