Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 M240 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M240 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1030MHz vs 900MHz)
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M240
0.659 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M +4%
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Nov 2015
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
41.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Jet
GPU Name
Opal
Jet XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy