Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 M240 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 105% (2115MHz vs 1030MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M240
0.659 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +1871%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
320
Shading Units
3072
20
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
41.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Jet
GPU Name
AD107
Jet XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy