Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 M240 and 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (1695MHz vs 1030MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M240
0.659 TFLOPS
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +2270%
15.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
320
Shading Units
4608
20
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
144
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
81.36 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
244.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.62 TFLOPS
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.62 TFLOPS
41.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
244.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
115W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Jet
GPU Name
AD106
Jet XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
188 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy