Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD FirePro W6150M

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Boost Clock940MHz
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M +128%
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Nov 2015
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
940 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Emerald
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy