Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (993MHz vs 940MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255 +41%
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Mar 2016
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
965 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
256
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.944 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.83 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
508.4 GFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.89 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
GM108
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
Unknown
125 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
16W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy