Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1006MHz vs 940MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255 +40%
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce MX110
0.515 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Nov 2017
Gem System
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
978 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
256
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
GM108S
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy