Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (940MHz vs 937MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350 +66%
1.199 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Feb 2020
Gem System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
747 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
5
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
GP107
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy