Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1477MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile +739%
6.05 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Dec 2021
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1185 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
1477 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.26 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.53 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.10 TFLOPS
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.050 TFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
189.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
GA107
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
Unknown
125 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy