Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (1605MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +1039%
8.218 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
1605 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.04 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.4 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.218 TFLOPS
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.218 TFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
AD107
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
Unknown
125 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy