Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1468MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +1568%
12.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Mar 2019
Gem System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
93.95 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
375.8 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.05 TFLOPS
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.03 TFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
751.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Vega 10
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy