Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M315 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R5 M315 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M315 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M315
0.745 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1557%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Gem System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.760 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
23.28 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
745.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
745.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
46.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Meso
GPU Name
AD107
Meso LE (216-0864046)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy