Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs NVIDIA P102 100

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs NVIDIA P102 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 116% (1683MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
P102 100 +2058%
10.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
320
Shading Units
3200
20
TMUs
200
8
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy