Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1499MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700 XT +1438%
7.675 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1499 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2560
20
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
95.94 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
239.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.35 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.675 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
479.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 10
-
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XTA
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy