Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +559%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Sep 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy