Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 285% (3000MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +12827%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
5376
20
TMUs
336
8
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy