Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 221% (2505MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
17856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +18148%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Dec 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
320
Shading Units
18176
20
TMUs
568
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy