Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +871%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2560
20
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Hawaii
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy