AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1695MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
+438%
4.339 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
384
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GA107
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
77 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
