AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (2000MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+281%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
DG2-128
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
