AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs Intel Arc A580
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 8GB VRAM Arc A580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 175W)
Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (2000MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Arc A580
+1424%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Oct 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1700 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.536 TFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
DG2-512
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
