AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+1819%
0.806 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
RV610
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP
(215LKBALA15FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
