AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs ATI FireGL V7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
64 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.06GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+62%
0.806 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
RV670
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
