AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD FirePro D500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro D500
+176%
2.227 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
24
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
