AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
+528%
5.069 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Hawaii
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
