AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
+130%
1.856 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Cayman
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
