AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs ATI FirePro V9800P
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800P to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)
ATI FirePro V9800P 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800P
+237%
2.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1600
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Cypress
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
