AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
+24%
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
RV770
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
