AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+1691%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
G96C
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
