AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+416%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Oct 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
G94B
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
