AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+515%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GT216
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
