AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+199%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430 PCI
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Oct 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GF108
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
