AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1665MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
+270%
2.984 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
TU117
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
