AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+13%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
240
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GT200B
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
