AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.60GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+7%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
0.749 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
768MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
81.60GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
384
Shading Units
288
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.800 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
748.8 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GF114
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
