AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1680MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060
+700%
6.451 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
1920
24
TMUs
120
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
TU106
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
TU106-200A-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
