AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+379%
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
120
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
RV630
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
