AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (2100MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
19072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI308X
+10038%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
19456
24
TMUs
1216
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
153 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
