AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO V710
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 28GB VRAM Radeon PRO V710 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 158W)
AMD Radeon PRO V710 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (2000MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (28GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO V710
+3330%
27.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Oct 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
28GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
224bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
504.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
54
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
3456
24
TMUs
216
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
54
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
54 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
432.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.30 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.65 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
864.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
158W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Navi 32
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Navi 32
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
