AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1219MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
+54%
1.248 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Lexa
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
