AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1086MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 5100
+382%
3.892 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
713 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1086 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.75 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
121.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.892 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.892 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 PRO GL
(215-0876144)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
