AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 580 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 580 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon RX 580 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1266MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 580 OEM
+623%
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 XT
(215-0876184)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
