AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 210W)
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 146% (2580MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+4816%
39.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
2070 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
60
384
Shading Units
7680
24
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
210W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
AD103
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
