AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
2
8
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
VSA-101
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Daytona
(355-0025-221)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
-
