AMD Radeon R7 250E vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250E and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250E 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250E
0.819 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
+123%
1.828 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R7 250E
561
GeForce GTX 1630
+274%
2100
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Jun 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
819.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
51.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
TU117
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
