Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +101%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Mar 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
1024
Shading Units
336
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.814 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.26 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
941.5 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF104
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy